[ad_1]
‘Why is the Haryana Deputy Chief Minister clinging to the chair when crop is being sold below MSP?’
Swaraj India nationwide president Yogendra Yadav, additionally nationwide working group member of All-India Kisan Sangarsh Coordination Committee (AIKSCC), on Sunday posed 10 questions to Haryana Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala on the three farm laws and requested him to both reply or step down.
Flanked by farmer leaders at a press convention in Chandigarh, Mr. Yadav additionally prolonged help to a name by 17 farmers’ teams in Haryana on behalf of AIKSCC to put siege to Mr. Chautala’s residence in Sirsa on October 6 on the difficulty of farm laws.
In an apparent reference to the resignation of Shiromani Akali Dal chief Harsimrat Kaur from the National Democratic Alliance authorities on the Centre over the controversial laws, Mr. Yadav stated the farmers of Punjab had claimed a “wicket” within the very first over and now it was the flip of the Haryana farmers to take the second wicket.
Posing the questions, Mr. Yadav demanded to know whether or not Mr. Chautala or his get together had ever demanded any regulation or a change just like the three farm laws and had been they ever consulted by the Bharatiya Janata Party earlier than or after the ordinances had been introduced in. He additional requested whether or not the three laws had been in any method related to the lockdown and coronavirus, and if not, then why they had been introduced amid the pandemic by way of ordinances.
Referring to the demand of the farmers to ensure Minimum Support Price, Mr. Yadav sought to know as to why the demand for MSP was not assured by way of regulation if these laws posed no hazard to it. “Does Mr. Chautala support the manner in which the laws were passed in the Rajya Sabha? How the farmers would be benefited by the amendment in the Essential Commodities Act allowing hoarding? Have the companies been allowed to loot both — the farmers and the consumers?” requested Mr. Yadav.
Stance questioned
Questioning the stance taken by the JJP over the three farm laws, Mr. Yadav demanded to know as to why the descendant of Chaudhary Devi Lal alone was defending the laws when not one of the farmer leaders and organisations had been prepared to talk of their help.
Asking Mr. Chautala to answer to the questions on October 6 to the farmers, he demanded to know as to why the Deputy Chief Minister was clinging to the chair when crop was being offered at a worth decrease than the MSP proper underneath his nostril.
[ad_2]
