No contempt case against Rajdeep Sardesai, says Supreme Court
[ad_1]
The Supreme Court’s public relations division late on Tuesday issued an announcement that the courtroom had not initiated any felony contempt proceedings against senior journalist Rajdeep Sardesai.
It clarified that info on the courtroom’s web site exhibiting the case standing was positioned “inadvertently” and “appropriate action to rectify the same is under process”.
“This is in context with news item being flashed in some news channels about initiating suo moto criminal contempt proceeding against Mr. Rajdeep Sardesai by Supreme court, it is made clear that no such proceeding has been initiated against Mr. Rajdeep Sardesai . However status shown at Supreme Court website vide case no. SMC (Crl) 02/2021 has been placed inadvertently. Appropriate action to rectify the same is under process,” the quick assertion circulated by way of WhatsApp by the courtroom’s public relations official mentioned.
The clarification got here shortly after the media printed info, primarily based on the web site standing, that the courtroom has suo motu registered felony contempt against Mr. Sardesai on February 13.
The info printed on the web site signifies that the case was registered on the premise of a plea filed by Astha Khurana, represented by advocate Omprakash Parihar, that Mr. Sardesai had intentionally tried to undermine the general public religion and confidence within the judiciary together with his tweets.
Mr. Sardesai’s tweets have been in reference to the Supreme Court verdict, final yr, punishing civil rights lawyer Prashant Bhushan with a ₹1 nice for his tweets “scandalising the court”.
The info on the registration of a suo motu contempt case against Mr. Sardesai got here as a shock as Attorney General K.K. Venugopal had, in September final yr, declined his consent.
In September, Mr. Venugopal had refused permission to provoke contempt against the journalist, saying in a one-page letter addressed to Mr. Parihar that “trifling remarks and mere passing criticism, though perhaps distasteful, are unlikely to tarnish the image of the institution”.
“I have given careful consideration to the tweets. I find the statements made by Mr. Sardesai are not of so serious nature as to undermine the majesty of the Supreme Court or lower its stature in the minds of the public… The reputation of the Supreme Court as one of the great pillars of our democracy has been built assiduously over years,” Mr. Venugopal had written in his reply to the contempt plea.
However, Ms. Khurana had pursued her case by submitting a plea within the Supreme Court, saying the “contemnor tweet is of serious nature putting a big question on sovereign function of Supreme Court and their abiding nature to the Constitution”.
[ad_2]
