[ad_1]
Nine girls legal professionals introduced to courtroom’s consideration a bail order handed by Madhya Pradesh HC in a sexual assault case not too long ago which ‘trivialised the victim’s trauma’.
The Supreme Court on Friday determined to seek the views of Attorney General {K}.{K}. Venugopal about courts imposing bail conditions for sex crime offenders which find yourself additional harassing, objectifying their victims.
A Bench led by Justice A.M. Khanwilkar determined to take into “consideration the position” of Mr. Venugopal, the federal government’s topmost legislation officer and constitutional authority, after 9 girls legal professionals introduced to the courtroom’s consideration a bail order handed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court in a sexual assault case not too long ago.
The High Court, as a situation for grant of bail, ordered the accused man to go to his sufferer at dwelling on ‘Rakshabandhan’ and “allow” her to tie a ‘rakhi’ on him.
The Bench scheduled a listening to on November 2.
The 9 legal professionals, led by advocate Aparna Bhat and represented by senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, mentioned the High Court order was a “trivialisation of her (victim’s) trauma”.
Mr. Parikh mentioned there have been many such cases of courtroom orders which objectified girls already traumatised by the crimes dedicated in opposition to them.
The legislation prescribed the sufferer to be saved far-off from the accused. Instead, right here, the Madhya Pradesh High Court had ordered the accused to go to the house of the girl — the very place the place the crime was alleged to have occurred.
The petition mentioned the High Court had additional ordered the accused to present the girl ₹11,000 “as a customary ritual usually offered by brothers to sisters on such occasion and shall also seek her blessings”.
It had additionally ordered the accused to provide ₹5,000 to the girl’s son for the “purchase of clothes and sweets”.
Mr. Parikh mentioned such orders solely succeeded in victimising the girl and retard the years of labor executed to sensitise the courts about how damaging it will be to try a compromise “by way of marriage or mediation between the accused and the survivor”.
[ad_2]
