[ad_1]
The AIADMK, by declaring the 66-year-old Edappadi {K}. Palaniswami as its Chief Ministerial candidate for the 2021 Assembly election, is the most recent to affix the current pattern of main political events asserting their CM candidates nicely forward of polling.
It has to vary its tack in view of the prevailing state of affairs, in response to many leaders of the occasion.
The occasion, when headed by its founder M.G. Ramachandran and his successor Jayalalithaa, didn’t formally promote them as its nominees for the CM submit between 1977 and 2016.
Seeking to elucidate the distinction between then and now, {K}.P. Munusamy, a celebration veteran and AIADMK deputy coordinator, says Mr. Palaniswami and Deputy Chief Minister-coordinator of the occasion O. Panneerselvam, who’re on the helm of the occasion, got here from inside the ranks.
“They have reached the present position, thanks to the guidance and support of Amma [Jayalalithaa]. It is but natural that we, in the party, have to declare Mr. Palaniswami our nominee so that there is no confusion among the party workers.”
Natural alternative
Dindigul C. Sreenivasan, Minister for Forest and one of the organising secretaries, stated Mr. Palaniswami, a four-time legislator and one-time Member of Parliament, had been offering “good governance” in the final three-and-a-half years. “It is but natural that he is projected as the CM candidate.”
A senior chief, talking on the situation of anonymity, stated there was a compulsion for the occasion to do “political branding” to counter the marketing campaign of its principal adversary, the DMK, highlighting its chief, M.{K}.Stalin, as the subsequent Chief Minister. “We, in the party, have been getting reports that several sections of society are of the view that Mr. Palaniswami, who first became Highways Minister in 2011 and got the PWD too five years later, has been functioning well as CM amid huge constraints of resources in the State. Who else can be promoted? So, the option for my party is very limited,” the chief observes.
C. Ponnaiyan, who was Minister through the Cabinets headed by MGR and Jayalalithaa and now Vice-Chairperson of the State Development Policy Council, says it was “incorrect” to say that MGR and Jayalalithaa weren’t projected because the CM nominees.
“Workers of the party and people of the State viewed them only as such. So, the present decision is nothing new.”
Besides, the day’s growth was in line with the understanding reached between the camps of Mr. Palaniswami and Mr. Panneerselvam on the time of merger of the 2 teams three years in the past.
“Also, the rank and file of the party regard Mr. Palaniswami as the capable leader who can challenge the DMK,” Mr. Ponnaiyan provides.
[ad_2]