Assam Assembly elections | Welfare measures not a decisive factor
[ad_1]
Contrary to standard knowledge and what was reported in some sections of the media, the Lokniti-CSDS post-poll survey information does not discover welfare schemes to have been a decisive factor for the National Democratic Alliance’s (NDA) efficiency within the Assam Assembly election. The survey signifies that not many households benefited from the State authorities’s welfare programmes. This was highlighted when the names of a minimum of 9 schemes launched by the State authorities had been learn out to the respondents — upon being requested in the event that they or a family member had benefited from any of those schemes, almost half of the households stated that they had not benefited from any of them and solely about 42% stated that they had benefited from a scheme or two.
However, among the many beneficiaries, the NDA loved a snug edge. The solely schemes that had a honest quantity of beneficiaries had been the ‘Orunodoi’ (a mounted month-to-month sum to at least one girl within the family) and the ‘Chah bagichar dhan puraskar mela’ (monetary support to tea backyard staff). About a quarter of voters (23%) claimed that the Orunodoi scheme was useful to them; of these, 59% voted for the NDA, 27% greater than Mahajot. Among non-beneficiaries of Orunodoi, NDA lagged by 9%. Notably, the respondents had been extra prone to have benefited from the Central authorities’s schemes, such because the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana (43%) and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (31%).
Further, amongst those that claimed to have acquired money of their financial institution accounts, the NDA had an fringe of 9% votes over the Mahajot, whereas amongst those that did not obtain money, it lagged by 7% votes.
The creator is a Researcher at Lokniti-CSDS, Delhi
[ad_2]
