Assembly ruckus | High Court refuses to stay summons issued to Jayarajan and Jaleel
[ad_1]
The Ministers had been requested to seem earlier than the court docket on October 28.
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday declined to stay the summons issued by the Thiruvananthapuram Chief Judicial Magistrate Court directing Ministers E.P Jayarajan and K.T. Jaleel to seem earlier than it on October 28 in a felony case registered in reference to the ruckus that passed off within the State Assembly in March 2015.
When a petition difficult the Justice of the Peace court docket order dismissing the plea of the prosecution to withdraw the case registered towards the Ministers and different CPI(M) leaders got here up, the federal government counsel sought to stay the summons issued to the Ministers for his or her look on October 28. In reality, different CPI(M) leaders V Sivankutty, Kunjahammad, C.K. Sadasivan and K Ajith had appeared earlier earlier than the trial court docket and taken bail within the case.
The Assembly had witnessed unprecedented scenes on March 13, 2015, because the then Opposition LDF members tried to stop the then Finance Minister, K M Mani, who was dealing with costs within the bar bribery case, from presenting the State funds.
Besides flinging the Speaker’s chair from the rostrum, digital equipments akin to computer systems, keyboard and microhpnes on the desk of the Speaker had been allegedly broken by LDF members.
Following the bedlam, a case was registered through the earlier UDF authorities’s regime charging the six Opposition LDF MLAs with offences below the Prevention of Destruction of Public Property Act and IPC sections 447 (felony trespass) and 427 (mischief inflicting harm). The case was based mostly on a grievance filed by the Assembly Secretary.
The LDF authorities determined to withdraw the case after contemplating a petition by V Sivankutty, CPI(M) chief and former MLA who was among the many accused within the case.
Dismissing the prosecution software in search of to withdraw the circumstances, the Justice of the Peace court docket had noticed that the withdrawal of such circumstances would ship a unsuitable message to society. It additionally added that the appliance in search of to withdraw the case was filed with out good religion and on extraneous concerns.
A letter from the Editor
Dear subscriber,
Thank you!
Your assist for our journalism is invaluable. It’s a assist for fact and equity in journalism. It has helped us preserve apace with occasions and happenings.
The Hindu has at all times stood for journalism that’s within the public curiosity. At this troublesome time, it turns into much more essential that we’ve entry to data that has a bearing on our well being and well-being, our lives, and livelihoods. As a subscriber, you aren’t solely a beneficiary of our work but in addition its enabler.
We additionally reiterate right here the promise that our group of reporters, copy editors, fact-checkers, designers, and photographers will ship high quality journalism that stays away from vested curiosity and political propaganda.
Suresh Nambath
[ad_2]
