Attorney General denies consent to contempt proceedings against Rahul Gandhi
[ad_1]
A petitoner had alleged that the Congress chief scandalised the judiciary by commenting that ‘the ruling party in the Centre has inserted its people into judiciary’.
Attorney General of India K.K. Venugopal has denied consent to the initiation of contempt proceedings against Congress MP Rahul Gandhi on the premise of a plea that he scandalised the judiciary in an interview.
Mr. Venugopal stated the statements of Mr. Gandhi have been “too vague to be said to have lowered the authority of the institution in the eyes of the public”.
Raising an fascinating level, the Attorney General stated Mr. Gandhi’s statements had typically referred to the “judiciary” and no particular mentions have been made concerning the Supreme Court or its judges.
Mr. Venugopal stated his prior consent because the Attorney General for initiating contempt was essential provided that the contempt had been made against the Supreme Court.
“Then the question of my granting consent would not arise,” he stated.
Mr. Venugopal was responding to a petition filed by advocate Vineet Jindal who alleged that Mr. Gandhi scandalised the judiciary by commenting that “the ruling party in the Centre has inserted its people into judiciary”.
[ad_2]
