CBI to study Supreme Court order to decide further action in ISRO espionage case
[ad_1]
The Central Bureau of Investigation will study the Supreme Court order, directing it to look into the Justice D.K. Jain Committee report on senior Kerala police officers who allegedly framed area scientist Nambi Narayanan in the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) espionage case of 1994, to decide further course of action.
“As soon as we get a certified copy of the order, it will be studied and a decision taken on whether the probe should be handed over to a special team or a unit,” mentioned a CBI official. The company has to furnish a report on the findings to the Supreme Court inside three months.
The case, initially pursued by the Kerala police, was transferred to the CBI on December 4, 1994, on the State authorities’s reference. In its closure report, the CBI had submitted that the espionage cost towards the scientists on the ISRO, together with Mr. Narayanan, was not proved and was discovered to be false. The findings have been accepted by the court docket.
‘No evidence’
As regards the function of Siby Mathews, who headed the Special Investigation Team that earlier performed the probe, the CBI had alleged in a report that he didn’t take sufficient steps both in regard to the thorough interrogation of the accused individuals by the Kerala police or the verification of the “so-called disclosure” made by them.
“In fact, he left the entire investigation to the IB surrendering his duties. He ordered indiscriminate arrest of the ISRO scientist and others without adequate evidence being on record…,” mentioned a CBI report addressed to the then State Chief Secretary, itemizing different alleged lapses. It has been talked about in the Supreme Court’s September 2018 order, primarily based on which the Justice D.K. Jain Committee was constituted.
Among the opposite investigating officers have been S. Vijayan, the then Inspector, Special Branch; and K.K. Joshwa, the then Deputy Superintendent of Police, CB CID.
Police lapses
The CBI later submitted in the court docket that in spite of highlighting a number of lapses and faults on the a part of the police officers whereas finishing up the investigation towards Mr. Narayanan and different accused individuals, the State authorities failed to take any action towards the erring officers.
“Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 (CBI) has submitted that the conduct of the police officials is criminal in nature as per the investigation and report submitted by the CBI. The investigation of the CBI had clearly established that the investigation carried out by the State police was full of lapses and also involved employment of illegal means such as criminal torture,” as recorded in the 2018 order.
[ad_2]
