Coronavirus | Health Secretary cautions against laxity over safety norms
[ad_1]
Health Secretary J. Radhakrishnan on Sunday cautioned against laxity amongst individuals and officers in taking measures to regulate the unfold of COVID-19 in Tamil Nadu.
Addressing the media after inspecting the allocation of greater than 300 further beds for COVID-19 at Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, he acknowledged that there was some laxity amongst a piece of officers and confused the necessity to not squander the features achieved earlier from efficient management and monitoring measures.
Strict implementation
Highlighting that solely 9 districts in Tamil Nadu had a take a look at positivity charge larger than 2% and solely 5 of them had greater than 3% for the time being, Mr. Radhakrishnan mentioned the officers had been requested to strictly implement the “test, track and treat” technique. “For every person testing positive, we are asking field workers to test at least 30 of their contacts,” he mentioned.
Pointing out that extra circumstances had been reported in clusters in flats throughout the second surge occurring now, he mentioned the ITIHAS software program, developed by IIT Madras, was getting used to establish potential hotspots. He urged individuals to at all times put on masks and preserve bodily distancing wherever attainable.
He reiterated that those that may work at home should go for that. He appealed to all those that had been eligible to get vaccinated on the earliest.
Decision on lockdown
To a query on lockdown, Mr. Radhakrishnan mentioned the federal government wouldn’t take any sudden choice that might trigger panic among the many public. He mentioned the state of affairs was totally different now with the supply of enough well being infrastructure and vaccines. The total state of affairs and the unfold of the illness had been monitored every day by the core committee shaped by the Chief Secretary.
Highlighting that the nation was now within the ‘Unlock 6’ part, Mr. Radhakrishnan mentioned the advantages and restrictions within the ‘Unlock 4’ and ‘Unlock 5’ phases had been being seemed into.
[ad_2]
