[ad_1]
Officials in query have been posted with railways, AAI, DGCA, Central Board of Indirect (*50*) and Customs, AIIMS-Delhi and a few public sector banks.
The Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) has, in its annual report, listed over 50 situations by which the disciplinary authorities of numerous authorities businesses didn’t totally adjust to its advice of proceedings and departmental action towards the accused officers.
The officers in query have been posted with businesses such because the railways, the Airport Authority of India (AAI), the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), the Central Board of Indirect (*50*) and Customs (CBIC), AIIMS-Delhi and a few public sector banks.
In one case, seven AAI officers have been accused of extending undue favour to a personal firm by permitting it to make use of expensive gear of the now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines, mendacity within the AAI custody, for illegal remuneration.
On June 3, 2019, the CVC suggested main penalty proceedings towards two officers and minor penalty proceedings towards 5. However, the disciplinary authority began minor penalty proceedings towards two, whereas it issued advisory memo to 4 and displeasure memo to 1 official, who had retired, with out referring their cases to the CVC for its second stage advice or reconsideration.
The annual report cites a case by which a Railway Chief Project Manager cancelled a young in 2010 to allegedly favour an ineligible agency, which was subsequently awarded the work. The official was additionally accused of disbursing extreme compensation towards the crops on an acquired land. However, towards the advice of main penalty, the official was exonerated.
In one other case, an Additional Divisional Railway Manager allegedly awarded a young for “Solar Power Plant for Emergency Load at the DRM Office” to the only real bidder, ignoring that vital papers weren’t submitted. The CVC suggested main penalty proceedings, however the official was exonerated in January 2019 with out looking for second-stage advice.
The report lists a case by which the CVC forwarded a criticism from an MP towards the then DGCA Joint Director-General, for investigation and report back to the Chief Vigilance Officer within the Ministry of Civil Aviation in June 2012.
False certificates
It was alleged {that a} captain working as an aviation academy pilot teacher issued false certificates to trainees resulting in the grant of industrial pilot licences. The DGCA probed the matter and an FIR was filed. The official was additionally accused of approving the captain’s appointment as chief flying teacher for illegal consideration.
In January 2019, the CVC conveyed its sturdy displeasure over an inordinate delay in furnishing the investigation report and the style by which the case was handled by the Ministry. It additionally noticed that proceedings within the legal case had not but been finalised.
The report states that well timed action was not taken towards a CBIC Additional Director, who confronted the cost of intentionally deceptive the Departmental Promotion Committee concerning qualification and expertise of an worker, which led to his affirmation and regularisation of service. The official retired.
An ONGC official had allegedly saved enquiry studies, associated to the action to be taken to ban two corporations, with himself in 2013-15. The CVC suggested main penalty however the disciplinary authority held that the costs didn’t maintain.
Among the listed cases are these involving alleged irregularities by three BHEL-EML officers; a Director of a Central Research Institute beneath the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences; and a few AIIMS-Delhi officers.
In an alleged case of unlawful gratification, the CBI had sought sanction for prosecution and initiation of main penalty proceedings towards one AICTE official. However, well timed action was not taken and the official retired, in line with the report.
[ad_2]
