[ad_1]
Former Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister says he apprehended his unlawful arrest on the premise of an Enforcement Directorate chargesheet earlier than a particular court docket underneath the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
Former Principal Secretary to the Chief Minister M. Sivasankar on Wednesday approached the Kerala High Court looking for anticipatory bail in a case filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in reference to the gold smuggling case.
In his petition, he mentioned that he apprehended his unlawful arrest on the premise of an ED chargesheet in reference to the case earlier than a particular court docket underneath the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Though the petitioner was questioned for greater than 90 hours by completely different businesses, no incriminating supplies may very well be gathered by them to implicate him within the alleged crime as was evident from the truth that the petitioner had not been arraigned as an accused within the remaining report already filed.
He identified that the ED had levelled “baseless allegations” in opposition to him to point that he had some reference to the alleged smuggling actions. In truth, he had conceded the very fact of his acquaintance with Swapna Suresh, prime accused within the smuggling case, whereas she was working as secretary to UAE Consulate General. The petitioner was holding a key submit within the authorities and he had event to contact the Consulate General in connection together with his duties. In truth, the petitioner got here to learn about the truth that Ms. Suresh and her mates have been concerned within the case and that they used to convey gold to India by misusing the workplace of Consulate General solely after the consignment was seized by the customs.
The particular case of the prosecution is that the smuggling actions began in November 2019. However, Whatsapp messages between petitioner and his Chartered Accountant that had occurred properly earlier than this date have been “needlessly annexed to create a false impression” that the petitioner had some involvement within the actions dedicated by the prime accused on this crime. The inclusion of those particulars within the chargesheet was deceptive. Details of those Whatsapp communications have been unrelated to the alleged crime, and mentioning them with out specifying dates have been deceptive, the IAS officer mentioned
He feared that the investigating company can be pressured to arrest him to keep away from criticism from the media.
[ad_2]
