[ad_1]
The Madras High Court on Wednesday questioned how college students of arts, science, engineering and postgraduate laptop utility programs may very well be anticipated to clear their arrears with out writing examinations, when an knowledgeable physique such because the All-India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) had opposed such a transfer by the State authorities.
Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and R. Hemalatha mentioned they might not hesitate to name for particulars such because the variety of arrears that every pupil had of their course of examine or their educational efficiency since Class X. The judges have been shocked over a authorities order (G.O.) issued on August 26, cancelling all arrear examinations citing the COVID-19 state of affairs.
The senior decide within the Bench mentioned neither the federal government nor Anna University had given a thought in regards to the availability of certified college earlier than beginning over 500 engineering faculties throughout the State. The results of opening such faculties was that there have been now too many engineering graduates within the State, however a lot of them lacked employable expertise.
The observations have been made through the listening to of a public curiosity litigation petition filed by E. Balagurusamy, 75, former vice-chancellor of Anna University, by means of his counsel E. Vijay Anand, in addition to one other PIL petition filed by advocate B. Ramkumar Adityan to declare the August 26 G.O. unlawful and arbitrary.
In his affidavit, Mr. Balagurusamy had mentioned that he had chosen to file the PIL petition to save lots of the standard of training, the way forward for college students and the status of assorted universities within the State. He mentioned the federal government’s resolution had demoralised meritorious college students who had cleared all papers with out arrears.
“The G.O. will definitely lower the education standard of the students and the universities… Several students have approached me and expressed their apprehensions about the future prospects and further informed me that most students have more than 25 arrear papers and have less than 25% marks in most of the subjects,” he mentioned.
The AICTE has already filed its response to the PIL petition and advised the court docket that the federal government’s resolution to cancel arrears was not in accordance with its tips. “The G.O. declaring all the students as passed without an assessment, by way of examination, is against the AICTE Act,” it mentioned.
On Wednesday, advocate V. Sudha, representing the UGC, sought two weeks’ time to file a counter affidavit on behalf of the fee. Immediately, Mr. Anand mentioned that it was important for the UGC to file its counter affidavit because the State authorities had been claiming that arrear exams have been cancelled as per UGC tips. When advocate Praveen Anand, representing among the faculty college students, additionally mentioned that the exams have been cancelled solely as per UGC tips, Ms. Sudha begged to vary with him and mentioned that the fee would make its stand clear within the counter affidavit.
Accepting her plea, the judges adjourned the circumstances to November 20.
[ad_2]
