[ad_1]
Court lists the subsequent listening to for November 2, when State has been requested to file a response
The family of the 19-year-old Dalit lady in Hathras, who died days after she was brutally assaulted and allegedly raped, on Monday appeared earlier than the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court and recorded their statements.
While an in depth written order was nonetheless awaited, legal professionals for the victim and the Uttar Pradesh authorities mentioned the courtroom had listed the subsequent listening to for November 2, when the State has been requested to file a response.
A division bench of the courtroom was listening to a PIL petition listed by it within the matter after taking suo motu cognizance of the incident and the occasions main as much as the hurried and alleged pressured cremation of the victim.
Affidavit filed
U.P. Advocate General V. {K}. Shahi mentioned the federal government filed an affidavit within the courtroom.
Also learn: Hathras case | Allahabad High Court rejects plea of victim’s family towards police ‘curbs’
The courtroom questioned Additional Chief Secretary Home Awanish Awasthi, ADG Law and Order Prashant Kumar and the Hathras District Magistrate, mentioned Mr. Shahi after the listening to however he refused to disclose additional particulars.
The courtroom directed Mr. Kumar and Special Secretary Home to look on November 2.
Lawyer for the victim’s family Seema Kushwaha mentioned the family had three fundamental prayers in courtroom and all of them have been thought of. First, the family demanded that the case be transferred out of U.P. Second, the small print of the investigation not be revealed by media because it “builds a different kind of narrative”. Third, the family demanded that they be supplied safety until the trial within the case was concluded.
Ms. Kushwaha acknowledged that she would submit an affidavit on behalf of the family earlier than November 2.
‘Police left speechless’
The police maintained their stand that the cremation of the lady befell with the family’s permission however had been with out solutions and left “speechless” when the courtroom cross-questioned them. The family needed the cremation at 5 a.m., however the police did it at evening with out their presence and with out following correct rituals, she mentioned.
The courtroom used “hard language” whereas asking the State officers that if that they had felt that regulation and order might be affected through the hurried cremation episode why didn’t they summon extra power, she added.
[ad_2]
