[ad_1]
The court docket stated that the case might be taken up for ultimate listening to as soon as the CBI filed the counter-affidavit.
The Kerala High Court on Wednesday dismissed a petition filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that sought to vacate the interim order staying the probe in opposition to U.V. Jose, Chief Executive Officer of LIFE Mission, in reference to the alleged irregularities within the LIFE Mission undertaking at Wadakkanchery in Thrissur.
The court docket final week stayed for 2 months additional proceedings within the investigation in opposition to the LIFE Mission CEO even because it allowed the CBI to go forward with the probe in opposition to Santhosh Eappen, MD of the Unitac , a contracting firm and the primary accused within the case. The interim stay order got here on the petitions filed by the LIFE Mission CEO and Mr. Eappen searching for to quash the FIR registered by the CBI.
Also learn | Kerala High Court stays CBI probe into LIFE Mission undertaking
When the CBI petition got here up for listening to on Wednesday, the court docket requested the investigating company counsel whether or not it had filed a counter-affidavit within the case, to which the counsel stated that it had been ready and despatched to the CBI Director for approval. It would quickly be filed, it knowledgeable the court docket.
The court docket then stated that the case might be taken up for ultimate listening to as soon as the CBI filed the counter-affidavit.
The State authorities submitted that the CBI try was to draw the eye of the media and humiliate it.
The CBI submitted in its petition that it couldn’t gather the related information of the LIFE Mission undertaking from the State authorities on account of the stay order. Besides, it couldn’t proceed with the probe because it was not ready to query and summon the LIFE Mission officers, authorities servants and others acquainted with info of the case. In reality, the stay had created critical hurdles within the probe.
The investigation company identified that that the High Court had noticed whereas issuing the stay that bigger authorized questions concerned required to be decided. In reality, the CBI was keen to argue the case as early as doable. The case concerned the pursuits of the State and critical investigation wanted to be carried out to unearth the deeper conspiracy. Therefore, the CBI pleaded for vacating the stay order within the pursuits of justice.
[ad_2]
