Regional security characterised by China’s actions: Army Chief

The “rising footprints” of China in India’s neighbourhood and its attempts to “unilaterally alter the status quo” alongside India’s disputed borders have created an setting of “confrontation and mutual distrust”, Army Chief Gen Manoj Naravane on Friday acknowledged and asserted that regional and inside connectivity was central to unleashing the potential of the Northeast and “balancing” the affect of China.

“A common thread that runs along the Northeast States is lack of coordination amongst various agencies. The policy disconnect is further accentuated by the feeling that affairs of the North East Region (NER) are being run from Delhi. Most of the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) and Central agencies are headquartered in Delhi. National priorities, political compulsions of the States and local aspirations are seldom aligned, creating dissonance in execution,” Gen. Naravane mentioned at a webinar organised by the United Service Institution of India.

Also learn: Parliament proceedings | Coordinated disengagement at Pangong Tso lake area, Rajnath Singh tells Rajya Sabha

Another distinctive issue that strengthened the “feeling of alienation” amongst the Northeast folks was “our dismissive, sometimes indifferent and often contemptuous approach.” “You would often hear the need to integrate the Northeast with mainland India. The perception that India is the mainland and the Northeast must align itself to the ways of the mainland in itself is flawed and contemptuous,” he acknowledged.

Integrated security council

To set the rating proper and unleash the super potential of the Northeast, he mentioned, there was want to determine an organisation that may synergise multi-agency coordination and optimise useful resource and energy. The realigned technique for the Northeast proposed a strong and efficient Northeast built-in security council.

Also learn: PM Modi a coward who can’t stand up to China, says Rahul Gandhi

Stressing on regional connectivity, the Army Chief mentioned, “With failure to deliver on promises, delivery deficit has plagued our efforts at improving regional connectivity. The Kaladan multimodal transport project and the trilateral highway have both seen cost and time overruns”.

The regional security setting was characterised by Chinese “belligerence” within the Indo-Pacific, its hostility in direction of weaker nations and relentless drive to create regional dependencies by way of initiatives just like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). The resultant Sino-U.S. rivalry had created regional imbalances and instability.

Also learn: India, China agree to return to pre-April 2020 positions in eastern Ladakh

“Nepal, our traditional long-term partner, which has witnessed heavy Chinese investment, is going through a period of political volatility,” he identified.

Conflict decision

Gen. Naravane mentioned most areas within the Northeast had progressed in direction of battle decision and consequently, the Army had undertaken transition from counter insurgency (CI) to built-in CI method. Based on the modern security scenario, the complete NER was divided into pockets of least resistance, partial resistance and pockets of energetic resistance to roll out a phased disengagement plan of the Army from CI deployment. The crimson belt alongside the India Myanmar border required a everlasting Army and Assam Rifles grid for efficient border administration, he famous.

The power calibration had resulted in disengagement of 14 Infantry Battalions. “Two Division headquarters, earlier part of the CI grid, are now solely focusing on their operational role along the northern borders. This has been a significant achievement. The operational responsibility of these areas has now been taken over by the Assam Rifles,” he added.