Report on Special DGP submitted, says govt.
[ad_1]
An Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), which inquired right into a latest sexual harassment criticism lodged by a lady Superintendent of Police towards a Special Director General of Police (now underneath suspension), has accomplished its proceedings after listening to all events involved and submitted its preliminary report, the State authorities knowledgeable the Madras High Court on Wednesday.
Appearing earlier than the primary Division Bench of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, particular senior counsel for the federal government A.L. Somayaji stated the ICC’s preliminary report had been submitted to the federal government and that additional plan of action would comply with sooner or later. When the Chief Justice insisted on a free and honest probe, the senior counsel assured that it will be finished so.
The submissions had been made in the course of the listening to of a case filed by a retired police officer insisting upon a CBI probe into the difficulty. However, Mr. Somayaji delivered to the discover of the courtroom that Justice N. Anand Venkatesh of the High Court had already taken suo motu cognisance of the difficulty and was monitoring the probe carried out by the CB-CID.
Stating that there couldn’t be a greater mechanism than a court-monitored probe, the senior counsel opposed the plea for a CBI probe. Advocate Abdul Saleem, representing the suspended Special DGP, additionally opposed the case on the bottom that his shopper had already appeared in particular person earlier than the ICC in addition to the investigating officer of the CB-CID and answered all queries raised in reference to the criticism. The Division Bench was knowledgeable that Justice Venkatesh had heard the case final month and granted eight weeks’ time for the investigating company to finish the probe and file a remaining report. The choose had additionally listed the case for listening to as soon as once more on April 30.
After recording their submissions, the primary Division Bench disposed of the case looking for a CBI probe because the CB-CID probe was being monitored by the High Court.
[ad_2]
