SC reserves order on dismissed BSF jawan’s plea on Varanasi polls
[ad_1]
He claims his nomination to contest was rejected to orchestrate a ‘walkover’ for Prime Minister Narendra Modi
The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved its order on a plea by dismissed BSF jawan Tej Bahadur Yadav, who claims that his nomination to contest from Varanasi within the Lok Sabha polls was rejected to orchestrate a “walkover” for Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Appearing earlier than a Bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad A. Bobde, Mr. Yadav’s lawyer, advocate Pradeep Kumar Yadav, nonetheless couldn’t produce proof on report to point out he had requested the Returning Officer (RO) for time to provide his dismissal letter – to be appended along with his nomination papers – displaying he was not dismissed from service for causes of corruption, disloyalty, and so forth.
Dismisses adjournment requests
The Bench brushed apart the petitioner’s repeated requests to adjourn the case. In reality, the courtroom accused Mr. Yadav of making an attempt to abuse the method of legislation by in search of repeated adjournments within the case.
“We don’t want to carry on like this with the matter, the respondent’s [Prime Minister] is the only office of its kind in India”, the CJI stated.
During the listening to, senior advocate Harish Salve, for Mr. Modi, submitted that Mr. Yadav had filed his nomination as an Independent candidate in addition to with help from the Samajwadi social gathering.
Mr. Yadav had argued that his dismissal from the BSF got here after he complained in regards to the high quality of meals and never for any act of corruption or disloyalty.
Papers discovered defective by RO
He discovered himself out of the battle after the RO discovered his nomination papers defective. The RO rejected his nomination on the bottom that he didn’t furnish information to show that his dismissal from the BSF was not caused by corruption or disloyalty to the State.
The petition contended that the RO fully failed to understand Mr. Yadav had produced his dismissal letter alongside along with his nomination paper.
“It seems the decision was taken keeping in mind the sensitivity of the contest in Varanasi constituency and to give walkover to the candidate of the ruling party by disqualifying the petitioner whose candidature was gaining momentum and was therefore also supported by the main Opposition alliance of two major political parties in the State. The malafide is apparent”, the plea stated.
[ad_2]
