TRP scam | Mumbai court rejects bail plea of BARC’s ex-CEO
[ad_1]
Partho Dasgupta was arrested by the Mumbai crime department final month for his alleged involvement within the TRP scam
The City Civil and Sessions Court in Mumbai on Wednesday rejected a bail plea of former chief government officer and managing director of Broadcast Audience Research Council (BARC) Partho Dasgupta within the Television Rating Point (TRP) manipulation case.
He was arrested from Pune on December 24 and is presently lodged within the Taloja Central Jail.
Special Public Prosecutor Shishir Hiray opposed his bail on the grounds that Whatsapp chats have been leaked through which there have been alleged conversations between him and the Prime Minister’s Office that went on to point out that he was an influential individual and will tamper with proof and sway witnesses who had been both former or present workers of the Council.
Mr. Hiray argued that the investigation was on and the police had been within the course of of submitting an extra supplementary cost sheet within the matter and the primary one had highlighted his prima facie involvement.
Also learn: TRP scam | Mumbai court rejects bail plea of BARC’s ex-CEO
Judge Milind Bhosale took into consideration the gravity of the offence and rejected his bail.
The supplementary cost sheet filed on January 11 talked about that Mr. Dasgupta, together with chief working officer of BARC Romil Ramgarhia, conspired to rig the information of random sampling of 40 weeks and misused their place to deceive the advertisers and folks.
On January 4, the extra chief metropolitan Justice of the Peace rejected his bail.
To file plea earlier than HC
Mr. Dasgupta’s legal professionals mentioned they might quickly file a bail plea earlier than the Bombay High Court .
He has been charged with sections 409 (prison breach of belief by public servant, or by banker, service provider or agent), 420 (dishonest and dishonestly inducing supply of property), 406 (punishment for prison breach of belief), 465 (punishment for forgery), 468, 201 (inflicting disappearance of proof of offence, or giving false data to display offender), 204 (destruction of doc or digital report to stop its manufacturing as proof), 212 (harbouring offender) of the Indian Penal Code.
