Until about 10 years in the past, I believed that it was possible to have hydropower projects in Uttarakhand: PSI Director
[ad_1]
It’s a folly to be constructing dams, and hydropower projects above elevations of two,200 metres, says Ravi Chopra, Director, People’s Science Institute
Ravi Chopra, Director, People’s Science Institute, has been a critic of hydropower projects in Uttarakhand and has chaired and been a part of a number of committees that have deliberated on infrastructure improvement in the State, whereas staying true to the ideas of sustainable setting. He spoke to The Puucho on the causes of the Uttarakhand deluge, the challenges of hydropower improvement and whether or not alternate fashions of improvement are possible.
How do you see the catastrophe in Uttarakhand? Is it pure or man-made?
What we all know up to now is that the temperatures on February 5 and 6 in the Himalayas have been increased than what’s regular for this time of the yr. A mass of ice, snow and contemporary water — at all times a deadly mixture — got here hurtling down a slope carrying with it plenty of boulder and rocks and different particles and reached the bottom of the Rishi Ganga river. However to those that’ve died and been swept away, it doesn’t matter if the origins of the floods have been from a glacial lake being breached or a rock falling on a glacier. While these are pure occasions, we have at varied earlier events warned of such dangers. It’s a folly to be constructing dams, and hydropower projects above elevations of two,200 metres. So in that sense, it’s completely a man-made catastrophe.
In the aftermath of the 2013 floods, you’d led a committee — underneath the orders of the Supreme Court — to examine the viability of hydropower projects. Were these suggestions heeded?
In the aftermath of the catastrophe, and after a number of petitions, there was no response from the federal government till the matter reached the Supreme Court. However, the Ministry of Environment and Forests, which was then led by (*10*), Mr. Shashi Shekhar, accepted our key suggestion — that a lot of the hydropower projects proposed by the Uttarakhand authorities be dropped. However, this led to the ability developer corporations then elevating objections that they have been being penalised in spite of following all of the norms of the environmental appraisal course of. That led to a second committee being shaped they usually opined that whereas all environmental appraisal norms have been adopted, it could be advisable to cancel hydropower projects.
A 3rd committee has been arrange however this time there have been barely any environmentalists and consisted nearly completely of engineers. There remains to be a relentless tussle and the Uttarakhand authorities has now cancelled a lot of the hydropower projects. The Clean Ganga mission and the Ganga draft regulation additionally performed a big function which influenced the Centre’s resolution to not develop any extra new hydropower projects.
The Uttarakhand authorities has been continually advocating for hydropower projects on the grounds that it is the one affordable supply of electrical energy to meet the developmental calls for of the area. Is a steadiness possible?
Until about 10 years in the past, I believed that it was possible to strike a steadiness between hydropower projects in Uttarakhand with out harming the setting right here however there’s actually no case for it now. There are a number of causes. One is that the price of solar energy has been dramatically diminished and it is not sensible to generate energy at ₹7-8 per unit when solar energy is ₹2. Second is that there isn’t a sustainable approach to develop such projects given the flouting of environmental norms and challenges with the disposal of particles, collected muck. The current avalanche plus the 2013 expertise present that dams in the para glacial zone (above 2,200 m) are a hazard to the individuals beneath.
Given that Uttarakhand, like most States, needs to present dependable electrical energy entry, Internet connectivity, what options are possible in phrases of energy provide?
We should have a solar-power based mostly improvement. Just as it was possible to individuals to design house shuttles to take them to the moon, solar-based storage has to be innovated and mass produced to be the primary supply of energy. Industrial improvement right here additionally has to be although by means of. There have been as soon as 80 metal rolling mills put in and it seems that they have been consuming practically half the State’s electrical energy. That’s unsustainable.
We want a services-based financial system on info know-how corporations corresponding to Infosys and Wipro that won’t be power-intensive. And we additionally want to develop our roads, enhance entry and go about it in a considerate sustained method such that it contributes to tourism. There are hundreds of locations right here with unexplored potential that can host homestays and as soon as that street infrastructure improves, it could be extraordinarily useful to the native financial system.
[ad_2]