Nikita Tomar murder case: Two convicts sentenced to life imprisonment
[ad_1]
A quick-track courtroom in Haryana’s Faridabad on Friday sentenced prime convict Tosif and his buddy Rihan to life imprisonment in reference to the murder of Nikita Tomar, 5 months after she was shot exterior her faculty in against the law caught on digicam.
The courtroom has additionally imposed a effective of ₹20,000 every on them, defence counsel Adal Singh Rawat advised reporters exterior the courtroom.
Pronouncing the decision on Wednesday, Additional Sessions Judge Sartaj Baswana held Tosif and his buddy Rihan responsible on costs of murder and felony conspiracy. Tosif was additionally individually held responsible below the Arms Act. His uncle Arjudeen, accused of supplying the weapon of offence, was let off, mentioned Public Prosecutor Sunil Kumar Parmar.
The prosecution had produced three eye-witnesses within the case, together with Nikita’s buddy accompanying her on the time of murder, and the closed-circuit tv footage that captured the incident. The different witnesses had been medical doctors and law enforcement officials. Besides the CCTV footage, the proof included the automobile used within the fee of the murder, the weapon of offence and forensic proof.
Nikita was popping out from Aggarwal College round 4 p.m. after taking an examination together with her buddy when Tosif and Rihan shot her and fled in a automobile. She later died throughout therapy. The murder led to large public outrage and the Haryana authorities, in its wake, introduced to promulgate legislation on “love jihad”.
On November 6, the Faridabad Police filed a 700-page charge-sheet in a report time of 11 days and listed 60 witnesses. The case was heard in a fast-track courtroom.
The courtroom on November 23 framed costs below sections 120B, 302,364, 366 learn with part 511/120B/34 Indian Penal Code in opposition to the accused Tosif and Rihan whereas costs below sections 120B IPC and 25(1)(a) of Arms Act had been framed in opposition to accused Ajrudeen. Separate costs below sections 25(1B)(a) and 27(1) of Arms Act had been framed in opposition to accused Tosif.
The accused, by means of their counsel, had made an attraction earlier than the Punjab and Haryana High Court searching for re-investigation into the case, however the identical was dismissed in February this yr.
[ad_2]